Indigenous Farmer in Indonesia Acquitted in Coal Mining Case
A Supreme Court in Indonesia has upheld the acquittal of an Indigenous Dayak farmer who was charged with stabbing other protesters in a coal mining protest.

The acquittal of an Indigenous Dayak farmer in Indonesia has brought attention to the risks faced by communities affected by coal mining and environmental and Indigenous rights defenders.
The case involves Misran Toni, also known as Imis, who was participating in a coal mining protest in East Kalimantan. He was charged with stabbing two villagers who were sleeping in the protest camp, resulting in one death and severe injuries to the other.
The dispute over coal transportation on village roads in Muara Kate village had been ongoing for some time. The villagers, including Imis, had set up a camp to stop the trucks, alleging that the authorities had failed to enforce regulations restricting coal transportation on village roads.
The following table compares the key events in the case:
| Event | Date | | --- | --- | | Coal transportation dispute erupts | Ongoing | | Truck rolls backward and overturns, killing a young pastor | October 2024 | | Dayak villagers, including Imis, protest by setting up a camp | October 2024 | | Two villagers are stabbed at the protest camp | November 2024 | | Prosecutors charge Imis with murder and place him in pretrial detention | November 2025 | | District court acquits Imis and releases him from custody | April 16, 2026 | | Imis files complaints with various government agencies | June 2026 |
The acquittal of Imis has been met with disappointment from the community, with Imis himself stating that he has spent nine months in police detention.
The case highlights the risks faced by communities affected by coal mining and environmental and Indigenous rights defenders who oppose Indonesia's coal industry. The Indonesian government has been criticized for its handling of the case, with allegations of intimidation and improper investigation.
The acquittal of Imis is a significant development in the ongoing struggle for Indigenous rights and environmental protection in Indonesia. It serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the rights of marginalized communities and ensuring that those responsible for human rights violations are held accountable.
The case also raises questions about the role of the Indonesian government in protecting the rights of Indigenous communities and ensuring that the country's coal industry is operated in a responsible and sustainable manner.
The acquittal of Imis is a step in the right direction, but it is clear that much work remains to be done to address the ongoing human rights concerns in Indonesia's coal mining industry.





