Voice and Witness
Groups at risk

Lesotho's unregulated Facebook 'news' pages

Unlicensed Facebook pages posing as news outlets operate in a regulatory blind spot in Lesotho, spreading misinformation without accountability, while

Unlicensed Facebook pages posing as news outlets operate in a regulatory blind spot in Lesotho, spreading misinformation...

Unregulated Facebook pages in Lesotho are posing as news outlets without any intention of complying with national broadcasting regulations. According to a statement originally published on lesotho.misa.org on 23 August 2026, these pages operate in a regulatory blind spot because the Lesotho Communications Authority’s (LCA) mandate primarily covers traditional broadcast media, leaving social media outside direct licensing oversight.

Under Section 38 of the Communications Act of 2012, Lesotho’s legal framework strictly categorizes media into Public, Private, Commercial, and Community services, each carrying statutory public responsibilities. Unregulated Facebook pages fit into none of these legal buckets. They hold no license, answer to no statutory category, and exploit a legal vacuum to masquerade as news outlets with zero public accountability.

The accountability gap

Legally and ethically, licensed outlets are bound to strict standards of truth, balance, and editorial independence grounded in the Communications Act No. 4 of 2012, the enforceable rules of the 2022 LCA Broadcasting Code, and the guiding vision of the National Media Policy. If a licensed station airs an unverified or sensational story, any affected party can lodge a formal complaint with the Broadcasting Disputes Resolution Panel (BDRP). Following an investigation, the regulator holds statutory authority to compel the station to broadcast a prominent, unedited retraction and apology during the exact same time slot, impose financial penalties of up to M80,000, or suspend their broadcasting license entirely for repeated non-compliance.

For severe or repeated non-compliance, the LCA board holds the ultimate statutory power to suspend or completely revoke an outlet’s broadcasting license. In contrast, victims of false reporting by unregulated social media pages cannot rely on administrative retractions or regulatory fines. They are left with limited, slow alternatives such as civil defamation suits or criminal proceedings under statutory penal codes, which can be expensive undertakings.

Public Relations Officer Neo Mokatsa highlighted this enforcement blind spot when false claims involving the Bureau of Statistics circulated online about the Lesotho Census 2026. Mokatsa noted that attempts to trace the individual behind the page revealed "it was like that person didn't exist." Without named bylines, registered contacts, or editorial oversight, these ghost operations hijack the credible badge of "News"to publish unverified claims for clicks."anonymous" social media operators. This creates a glaring institutional paradox: government entities decry viral misinformation when it threatens public order, yet eagerly validate the very platforms responsible for it when seeking quick publicity.

Shaking hands with an unverified clickbait page trades institutional authority for temporary views. By treating anonymous content creators like accredited press, public officials subvert Lesotho’s media framework from the inside. They signal to the public that ethical standards, verification, and legal accountability no longer matter as long as a page has a wide enough reach.

A proposed ecosystem of accountability

To safeguard Lesotho's democratic space, the statement argues that what is needed is an ecosystem of uncompromising accountability, where independent press bodies set the ethical standard, tech platforms enforce transparent labeling, and public institutions step up to defend the truth. The source states this does not require government censorship or heavy-handed state licensing that stifles free expression.

When platforms like MISA Lesotho’s CheckDesk intercept viral fabrications in real time, they demonstrate proactive verification. But civil society cannot carry this defense alone. The statement calls for every government ministry and public body to institutionalize its own responsive fact-checking desk, treating rapid, transparent clarification as an enforceable public duty. When paired with platform-enforced badges and MISA Lesotho’s national Media and Information Literacy (MIL) policy initiative, the source argues lasting immunity against viral manipulation can be built, equipping every Mosotho to see through algorithmic traps.

Related coverage

More from Groups at risk